Published By CoST Admin |  August 15, 2025

Report Recommendations

On 17th July 2025, CoST Uganda launched our 6th Independent Review Report conducted under  Ministry of local government -a study on road infrastructure projects. The study assessed  Uganda’s disclosure practice performances for roads infrastructure data on different procurement  documentations both proactively and reactively. Different platform including donor websites,  Government procurement portal (GPP), eGP, ministry websites and physical documents were  assessed comprehensively against the CoSTIDS and Open contracting for infrastructure data  standards (OC4IDS) data points/indicators. The findings highlighted both progress and persistent  gaps, with actionable recommendations to strengthen sustainability, biodiversity protection,  climate finance safeguards among others. The overall disclosure at Ministry of Local Government  was at 59% arising from Proactive disclosure at 58% and reactive disclosure at 60%. 

This article calls on government to take up these recommendations and translate them into policy  and practice. With emphasis to Ministry of Local Government, PPDA, Ministry of Works and  Transport, Office of the Prime Minister and all local governments that participated in the  independent review/assurance process including Gomba, Nwoya, Kitgum, Ntoroko, and Kabarole 

district local government. 

Summary of Independent Review Findings 

1. Weak disclosure and transparency systems 

2. Persistent cost overruns especially LEGS projects 

3. Limited involvement of local communities in planning and implementation of road works  4. Weak asset management and no road maintenance plans 

5. Insufficient institutional and technical capacity 

6. Weaknesses in post-construction handover processes 

7. Delayed programme implementation 

8. Heavy reliance on loan funding. Overall loan funding at 61.5%, (25.3%Grants and 11.5%  GOU funding other for beneficiary fund) 

9. Weak contractual enforcement mechanisms. lacked comprehensive binding provisions on  quality assurance ESHS and tender management issues. 

Recommendations to Government 

1. Improve internal information management systems/Disclosure all infrastructure data  government’s digital disclosure platforms eg. GPP to enhance transparency and  accountability.  

2. Institutionalize knowledge transfer and handover protocols, establish end-of-project  workshops where technical staff are briefed on project outcomes, challenges, and  recommendations. 

3. Strengthen contract management framework by institutionalizing mandator/ technical  reviews of contract designs and Bills of Quantities (BoQ) prior to tendering 4. Strengthen asset management units for inventory, maintenance schedules, and asset  condition monitoring to ensure efficient /effective management.  

5. Establish a dedicated Infrastructure Asset Management Unit for supervision, 

6. Incorporate road infrastructure maintenance planning and asset performance tracking 7. Launch national capacity-building programmes for Local Government engineers on  construction contract administration, environmental- social safeguards, quality  management systems, and infrastructure asset management. 

8. Urgently revise standard contract templates for infrastructure projects to include  comprehensive binding provisions for Quality Assurance, Environmental & Social  Safeguards and Health & Safety management to clearly define contractor obligations,  reporting requirements and compliance measures. 

9. Strengthen pre-tender engagements with bidder conferences to attract more private sector  in procurement for road infrastructure. 

10. Advocate for increased budget allocation to local government infrastructure development.  absence of structured monitoring frameworks for Quality Assurance, E&S and Health &  Safety 

11. Involve communities in planning process for infrastructure projects through baraza  meetings